Fruit decision tool
Decide whether the fruit you just found is worth replacing your current one. The call stays tied to the current use-case board and its visible source status.
What this tool is for
Fruit Comparison answers a focused question: should the fruit you have now stay equipped, or is the fruit you just found a better next move for the activity that matters today? Select both fruits and choose your immediate priority. The tool reads the existing fruit board for that goal, shows the two relevant tiers, and keeps the other four goals visible so a narrow improvement does not hide a meaningful trade-off.
This is not a general fruit directory. The left selector is the fruit you currently use; the right selector is the option asking for your resources. That framing matters when a switch has a real cost. The verdict tells you what the current board supports for this pair and this goal, while the scorecard lets you see where the recommendation would change if your route changes later.
Overall, Grinding, PvP, Bosses, and Beginner are separate tier lenses. Pick the one that matches your active route rather than assuming Overall answers every question. The comparison reads those listed tiers directly. It does not combine them into a hidden weighted score, convert rarity into strength, or create an artificial 100-point rating just to produce a winner.
A rank has less value when its live behavior still needs confirmation. Each result retains its status badge and the tool can return a close call, verify-first result, or reference-only result instead of exaggerating confidence. That is intentional: the right response to incomplete or update-sensitive evidence is a cautious next step, not a confident reroll command.
Why the comparison starts with your goal
Replacing a fruit is usually a timing decision, not a search for a permanent champion. A player clearing progression content, a player preparing for a boss route, and a player focused on PvP can rationally choose different priorities from the same board. Choosing the goal first makes the result explainable: you can see which lens changed the call and whether another part of your plan would be weakened by the switch.
If you are early in progression, select Beginner instead of letting a generic overall placement decide for you. The result will compare the entries through that route lens, then show the wider scorecard for context. This prevents a player-friendly choice from being dismissed simply because it is not the same answer as an endgame, bossing, or PvP-oriented recommendation.
Select Grinding when your next stretch is farming, Bosses when you are planning that route, or PvP when that is the decision in front of you. The goal selector does not claim that every mechanic is measured; it chooses which documented tier column the tool reads. Treat the full scorecard as a quick trade-off map, not a prediction of every encounter.
A new fruit can look tempting because of its name, rarity, or a single anecdote. Those are not enough to turn it into a stronger recommendation. When the tool flags reference-only or verify-first data, hold the switch, inspect the wiki evidence, and wait for a stronger live check. That restraint is often more valuable than a fast but unsupported answer.
How to compare two fruits
The tool is built for a quick in-game decision, but a short setup prevents most bad comparisons. Keep the question small, use the goal that matches the next activity, and let the status badge set the confidence level of the call.
Choose your equipped fruit as Current fruit. If My Haze Seas is configured, use the shortcut to load its saved fruit instead of retyping the plan from memory. That saved selection is a convenience, not fresh evidence; make sure it still matches your actual current fruit before using the result.
Put the fruit you can genuinely choose next in the New fruit selector. By default, the roster emphasizes available non-form entries so the first comparison is a practical one. If you are researching a form or an unavailable entry, reveal reference entries deliberately and expect the tool to preserve that qualification rather than treating it as a live recommendation.
Select Overall, Grinding, PvP, Bosses, or Beginner. Do not choose the goal that makes the candidate look best; choose the one that describes the next thing you intend to do. You can run a second comparison for another route afterward, but read it as a separate scenario rather than averaging all five labels into a made-up score.
Select Compare fruits. The verdict explains the call for the selected goal, while the row-by-row scorecard reveals the other tier lenses. Read the Current and New cards as well: their status badge, first documented edge, watch-out, and wiki link tell you why a rank alone may not settle the decision.
When an available candidate has a clear replace call, you can set it as your current fruit in My Haze Seas or save it as a plan target. A keep call is still useful: it tells you not to spend on this candidate for the chosen route. For close, verify-first, or reference-only results, open the evidence and keep the decision tentative.
Data and decision limits
The tool compares the listed Overall, Grinding, PvP, Bosses, and Beginner tiers directly. It does not invent prices, drop odds, DPS, skill multipliers, mastery requirements, V2 materials, movement speed, or a hidden weighted score when the available sources do not support one. A good comparison keeps the known data visible and names the unknown data instead of filling the gap with a confident guess.
Tier labels summarize the current board for a stated use case. They are useful for a fast route check, but they are not a measured damage test and they do not describe every move, combo, target, or player preference.
Needs-testing, update-sensitive, and legacy-renamed candidates receive a verify-first response when they would otherwise win. Unavailable or unreleased candidates are reference-only. The tool intentionally does not promote uncertain data into a confident live decision.
Rarity can appear on the fruit card as source context, but it is not used as a shortcut for strength. Read the goal-specific tiers, status, documented edge, and watch-out before treating a candidate as an upgrade.
Data status: Board-based recommendation. If the result would consume a scarce spin or reroll and its status asks for verification, treat it as a tentative route signal and check the linked wiki source before committing.
Fruit comparison FAQ
These questions explain how the comparison behaves so its verdict remains useful, fast to scan, and honest about the data that supports it.
It compares a current fruit and a candidate against the same visible fruit board. You choose Overall, Grinding, PvP, Bosses, or Beginner as the immediate priority, then the result shows the relevant tier plus the full five-goal scorecard. It is a route decision aid, not an invented DPS calculator or a universal best-fruit claim.
No. A higher candidate tier can produce a replace call only when the candidate is available and its source status does not require a cautious verdict. A tie becomes a close call, while needs-testing, update-sensitive, legacy-renamed, unavailable, or unreleased entries can require verification or remain reference-only. Your selected job also matters more than a generic overall placement.
The default roster is meant for a live replacement choice, so it starts with available, non-form entries. Turn on “Show forms and reference-only entries” when you need context for a form or an unavailable item. The tool keeps those entries visibly qualified and will not present a reference-only fruit as a live replacement recommendation.
If you have configured a fruit in My Haze Seas, the tool can load it as your current fruit. After a comparison, you can set an available winner as your current fruit or save the candidate as a plan target. Those are browser-local planning actions, so revisit the tier status and your route before treating a saved value as a final commitment.
Do not force the result into a switch. Open the linked wiki entry, inspect the visible status and source notes, and check the Fruit Tier List for the wider board. If the candidate is update-sensitive or needs testing, wait for stronger evidence before spending a reroll, spin, or other scarce resource.
More tools